Anti-Islam mobilization forms a transnational organized political movement, not mere prejudice.

Evidence

The early years of the 21st century have seen an extraordinary proliferation of political mobilizations against Islam in many European and North American countries, including campaigns against the building of mosques and minarets, and for imposing ‘burqa bans’. This shows that anxiety about the place of Islam in ‘western’ societies transcends national boundaries. Furthermore many actors involved in these campaigns have built extensive international networks, and have long been sharing organizational models, strategies, tactics and resources. Significantly, many right-wing political parties, protest movements and advocacy groups across Europe and North America have come to view themselves as part of a transnational ‘counter-jihad’ movement dedicated to resisting what they perceive as the ‘Islamization of the west’. This sphere of activity goes beyond casual prejudice or bigotry towards Muslims: it is grounded in a developed political ideology, supported by a complex organizational infrastructure, and goes far beyond simply issuing Islamophobic pronouncements. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 515

The early years of the 21st century have seen an extraordinary proliferation of political mobilizations against Islam in many European and North American countries, including campaigns against the building of mosques and minarets, and for imposing ‘burqa bans’. This shows that anxiety about the place of Islam in ‘western’ societies transcends national boundaries. Furthermore many actors involved in these campaigns have built extensive international networks, and have long been sharing organizational models, strategies, tactics and resources. Significantly, many right-wing political parties, protest movements and advocacy groups across Europe and North America have come to view themselves as part of a transnational ‘counter-jihad’ movement dedicated to resisting what they perceive as the ‘Islamization of the west’. This sphere of activity goes beyond casual prejudice or bigotry towards Muslims: it is grounded in a developed political ideology, supported by a complex organizational infrastructure, and goes far beyond simply issuing Islamophobic pronouncements. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 510

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Frames the chapter’s ‘counter-jihad’ concept as a developed ideology with organizational infrastructure, a key definitional move distinguishing it from casual Islamophobia.
  • XREF: Connects to the contested-Islamophobia-definition debate: this passage takes the view that the phenomenon is systemic and ideological rather than merely attitudinal — implicitly countering Bleich’s neutral attitudinal concept. — connects to: Anti-Muslim mobilizations form a transnational movement with distinct ideology and policy reach. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 545; Anti-Muslim sentiment operates independently of local political ideology; Anti-Muslim sentiment spans opposing political groups, not just white conservatives (+7 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 515; Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 510

Broader Connections