White feminists appropriated feminism while hooks reclaims it for all people

Evidence

It is a contradiction that white females have structured a women’s liberation movement that is racist and excludes many non-white women. However, the existence of that contradiction should not lead any woman to ignore feminist issues. Oftentimes I am asked by black women to explain why I would call myself a feminist and by using that term ally myself with a movement that is racist. I say, “The question we must ask again and again is how can racist women call themselves feminists.” It is obvious that many women have appropriated feminism to serve their own ends, especially those white women who have been at the forefront of the movement; but rather than resigning myself to this appropriation I choose to re-appropriate the term “feminism,” to focus on the fact that to be “feminist” in any authentic sense of the term is to want for all people, female and male, liberation from sexist role patterns, domination, and oppression. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 564

Categorization

  • SEED: The question ‘how can racist women call themselves feminists’ could anchor an essay on ownership and authenticity of political labels.
  • XREF: connects to: White feminists appropriated slave suffering to advance their own cause. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 368; White feminist organizing surged in reaction to black men gaining rights. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 366; White feminists’ self-victimization rhetoric served their opportunistic interests — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 421 (+16 more)

Broader Connections