Generic terms in suffrage histories suppress the exclusion of black women.

Evidence

In the statement, “their shocked disbelief that men should so humiliate them by supporting votes for Negroes but not for women,” the word men in fact refers only to white men, the word Negroes refers only to black men, and the word women refers only to white women. The racial and sexual specificity of what is being referred to is conveniently left unacknowledged or even deliberately suppressed. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 36

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Demonstrates how apparently neutral historical language encodes racial and sexual specificity.
  • XREF: Mirrors hooks’s method of unpacking deceptively universal terms in feminist/race discourse. — connects to: White women’s clubs excluded black women even from token recognition — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 379; Black women named their race in group titles because exclusion forced it — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 470; Historians have systematically omitted black women from accounts of feminist history — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 463 (+6 more)

Broader Connections