White dominance in feminism reflects racial imperialism, not black disinterest

Evidence

Most women involved in the recent move toward a feminist revolution assume that white women have initiated all feminist resistance to male chauvinism in American society, and further assume that black women are not interested in women’s liberation. While it is true that white women have led every movement toward feminist revolution in American society, their dominance is less a sign of black female disinterest in feminist struggle than an indication that the politics of colonization and racial imperialism have made it historically impossible for black women in the United States to lead a women’s movement. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 464

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to hooks’s broader argument (ch. 1-4) about how racial imperialism structured black women’s position. — connects to: White feminists pursued work rights only for white women workers — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 387; Early second-wave feminism was dominated by white women who excluded black women — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 405; White women’s linguistic erasure of black women served their own political interests — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 416 (+9 more)
  • SEED: Angle for an essay on how structural exclusion is misread as disinterest — a pattern that recurs across movements.

Broader Connections