Liberation modeled on white male power inherently divides women from each other.

Evidence

Women’s liberationists, white and black, will always be at odds with one another as long as our idea of liberation is based on having the power white men have. For that power denies unity, denies common connections, and is inherently divisive. It is woman’s acceptance of divisiveness as a natural order that has caused black and white women to cling religiously to the belief that bonding across racial boundaries is impossible, to passively accept the notion that the distances that separate women are immutable. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 456

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to hooks’s earlier claim in this book that mainstream feminism mirrored patriarchal frameworks rather than challenging them. — connects to: White men set the terms of women’s liberation and exploit inter-group competition — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 454; Both white and black patriarchies framed feminism as opposition to black liberation. — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 541; White men sympathized with black power because shared sexism overrode racism — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 276 (+15 more)

Broader Connections