Value in the bio-economy is produced through valuation practices, not intrinsic to biological matter.

Evidence

What is missing from these perspectives, however, is consideration of the political-economic actors, knowledges, and practices involved in the creation and management of value. As part of a rethinking of value in the bio-economy, this article analyzes three key political-economic processes: financialization, capitalization, and assetization. In doing so, it argues that value is managed as part of a series of valuation practices, it is not inherent in biological materialities. — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy, 1

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sets up the central intervention: value as managed/constructed through valuation practices (financialization, capitalization, assetization) rather than inherent in biological materiality — the core definitional move of the assetization debate.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The counterintuitive inversion — value located in practices/management rather than the biological material itself — reorients how one reads commodification claims across STS and finance.
  • XREF: connects to: Value emerges from relational valuation practices, not from objects themselves. — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 23; The economy is a constructed concept rather than a natural object. — Andrew deWaard, Derivative Media: How Wall Street…, 538; Exchange itself, not utility or scarcity, creates economic value. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 261 (+5 more)

Broader Connections