Capitalization scholarship often treats capital as a living thing embodied in commodities.

Evidence

  1. Current science and technology studies analyses of the bio-economy have engaged with the concept of capitalization in certain ways. For example, a number of scholars have theorized the capitalization of life, vitality, biology, hope, and so on. (e.g., Waldby 2000; Rose 2007; Kent 2012; Sunder Rajan 2012; Martin 2015). However, it is not always clear how this concept is being deployed, analytically speaking, by these scholars. It seems to be used in the sense of describing the transformation of something (e.g., life, tissue, etc.) into capital, although this then tends to treat capital (and value) as a ‘‘living thing’’ embodied in the commodity form; this is evidenced by the development of concepts like ‘‘lively capital’’ (Sunder Rajan 2012). — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy, 121

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes the ‘capitalization’ concept as used in STS bio-economy scholarship from a market-maker definition of value.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s assetization debate — this framing of capitalization-as-embodied-lively-capital is precisely what assetization theory challenges.