Accounting for biological assets reflects chosen methods, not intrinsic biological qualities

Evidence

Accounting for assets, in general, is not an objective or neutral measure of some latent or inherent quality of biology itself. Any analysis of value in the bio-economy has to look at a range of valuation methods—for example, asset, income, or market approaches (e.g., Bratic, Blok, and Gostola 2014)—as well as different valuation expectations. — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy, 78

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallels the reader’s existing work on trees as underused infrastructure, which treats biological assets as mattering rather than inert. — connects to: Accounting practices involve interpretation and are not straightforwardly performative — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy:…, 35; In the bioeconomy, informational signaling about assets, not product sales, constitutes firm value. — Kean Birch, Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy:…, 106; Sustainability accounting quantifies some impacts while obscuring hard-to-measure ones — Gerald F. Davis & Suntae Kim, Financialization of the Economy, 88 (+3 more)

Broader Connections