The hijab signals foreignness so strongly it overrides ethnicity and skin tone

Evidence

One of the ways private citizens surveil Muslims is by questioning their nationalities. Interactions with private citizens reveal that Muslim Americans are often treated as if they are enemies who have trespassed American borders. Private citizens participate in the racialization of Muslim Americans when they watch, monitor, and interrogate them in public and private spaces. The encounters the Muslim Americans interviewed had with their fellow citizens show how ethnicity and race become less prominent in their interactions when religious signifiers are present. Muslim American women who did not wear the hijab were not subjected to the same verbal harassment or the same watchful eye as those who did, regardless of skin tone. The hijab is clearly equated with foreignness, and as a result, Muslim women’s bodies are under the gaze of their fellow citizens. They are racialized through this surveillance as forever foreign and never American. — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 349

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly addresses the religion-vs-race guiding question: a religious signifier functions as a racial marker independent of skin tone. — connects to: The hijab functions as Islam’s most provocative symbol in Western public discourse.; The Hijab Ban solidified the idea that Muslim and French are clashing identities; Cultural and religious practices can racialize a body just as skin tone does — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 89 (+23 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 349
  • recurring: this claim recurs 5 times within its source

Library Connections

Broader Connections