Sound measurement must be frequency-weighted because ears are not uniformly sensitive

Evidence

Just as the notation of music is now being replaced by the record player, the tape recorder is pushing the physical study of acoustics into the human area of psychoacoustics. And for general field work in measuring the intensity of sound, the flat response of the sound level meter (the so-called C scale) has given way to the contoured A scale, weighted along the lines of the equal loudness contours of the human ear. Similarly, the numerous refinements in measuring aircraft noise in recent years have tended more and more to take human response into consideration. Thus EPNdB (Effective Perceived Noise in Decibels) takes into account the particular tone components of aircraft as well as the duration of the noise, while NNI (Noise and Number Index) uses the EPNdB as a basis and additionally calculates the number of aircraft per day (or night) as a key annoyance factor. — Schafer, Murray R, The Soundscape- Our Sonic Environment…, 440 (#expands, via linked claim)

In the frequency range between 2 and 5 kHz almost every subject with normal hearing exhibits a very sensitive range in which very small sound pressure levels below 0 dB are reached. — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 168 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Loudness meters use frequency weightings as a compromise because ear response varies with level; Human hearing requires far more SPL to detect low-frequency tones than mid-range ones; Ear frequency response varies with amplitude, especially at low frequencies. (+5 more)

Broader Connections