Schutz tied temporal coordination to shared space, which global electronic trading severs.

Evidence

In basing his we relationship in a community of time and putting aside the question of understanding other minds, Schutz did not, however, also put spatial immediacy aside. For Schutz, sharing the same segment of time implied the genuine simultaneity of participants’ streams of consciousness only if they shared a common space—the space that afforded them the possibility of partaking in the “step-by-step constitution” of experience of an unfolding event (Schutz 1964, p. 34). Schutz evidently made no distinction between spatial immediacy and the possibility of paying attention to the same event. This distinction is, however, a crucial one when events mediated by electronic transmissions can be witnessed in real time worldwide without participants’ sharing of a common space. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 68

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Global traders form communities of time by observing a shared screen object — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures: The Virtual…, 60; Shared temporal structuring of a common object distinguishes global markets from ordinary electronic groups — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures: The Virtual…, 141; Global markets form communities of time bound by a common observed screen object. (+4 more)

Related

• Geographically dispersed markets achieve social integration through time, not space (similarity 0.92)
• Global traders form communities of time by observing a shared screen object (similarity 0.90)
• Shared temporal structuring of a common object distinguishes global markets from ordinary electronic groups (similarity 0.88)
• Global markets form communities of time bound by a common observed screen object. (similarity 0.85)
• A market’s trading screen functions as a shared witnessable situation across continents. (similarity 0.82)
• Markets combine distinct forms of coordination beyond network embeddedness, including reflexive temporal coordination. (similarity 0.82)
• Trading screens transform distant markets into interactionally present scenes. (similarity 0.82)
• Screen-based reciprocal observation can generate intersubjectivity across geographic distance in markets. (similarity 0.81)
• Screen content assembles a globally shared object traders can watch together (similarity 0.81)
• Geographically dispersed but mutually oriented actors form global microstructures that bind markets together. (similarity 0.80)
• Screen-mediated markets relax the need to directly observe traders watching (similarity 0.79)
• Global market interaction produces intersubjectivity beyond face-to-face encounters (similarity 0.78)
• Insider trading impulses presuppose rather than undermine market temporal community (similarity 0.78)

Broader Connections

• Global traders form communities of time by observing a shared screen object #qualifies (0.85) — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 60
• Global markets form communities of time bound by a common observed screen object. #qualifies (0.85)
• Trading screens transform distant markets into interactionally present scenes. #qualifies (0.82) — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 27
• Shared temporal structuring of a common object distinguishes global markets from ordinary electronic groups #qualifies (0.80) — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 141
• A market’s trading screen functions as a shared witnessable situation across continents. #corroborates (0.80) — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 21
• Geographically dispersed markets achieve social integration through time, not space #qualifies (0.80) — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 91
• Social transactions require intersecting time-space paths at stations #qualifies (0.75) — David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity, 1322