Regime capacity, not just state consolidation, shapes revolutionary coalition frequency and type.

Evidence

As the recent history just canvassed suggests, however, changes in the prevalent forms of revolutionary coalitions followed contrasting rhythms in different regions. Regions of relatively early state consolidation included the Low Countries, France, and the British Isles. Those regions saw early peaks of communal, patron-client, and dynastic revolutionary coalitions in reaction to that very consolidation. But once fairly high-capacity governments took control of the same regions, revolutionary coalitions formed less frequently and shifted toward the national and class coalition types. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1043

Categorization

• XREF: This bears directly on the reader’s core hypothesis: institutional absorption (high-capacity governments) does not eliminate revolutionary coalitions but shifts them toward national and class forms — exactly the asymmetry-channelling question the reader is testing against Tilly’s framework. — connects to: High regime capacity and democracy suppress revolutionary situations by raising organizing costs. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 979; Revolutionary situations concentrate in low-capacity regimes while revolutionary outcomes remain rare everywhere — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 985; Revolutionary coalitions vary along territorial-interest and direct-indirect connection axes — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 999 (+9 more)
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1043

Broader Connections

• Regime capacity and democracy jointly shape prevailing contentious repertoires. #corroborates (0.92) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 533
• High capacity and democracy suppress revolutionary situations while medium-capacity regimes favor outcomes #corroborates (0.90) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 979
• Higher regime capacity with some democratic freedoms produces intermediate contention #exemplifies (0.88) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 503
• Regime structure determines revolutionary situation frequency and character #qualifies (0.85) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1045
• Regime and repertoire organization shapes which revolutionary shifts occur. #expands (0.82) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 995
• State growth shifted revolutionary coalitions from direct to indirect organizational forms #expands (0.78) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1016
• Revolutionary coalitions vary along territorial-interest and direct-indirect connection axes #expands (0.75) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 999
• High-capacity mobilization hits the regime directly while low-capacity contention rarely does #qualifies (0.75)