Recategorizing someone as a victim shifts them toward moral-patient perceptions while suppressing perceived agency.

Evidence

A perceptual tendency toward moral typecasting could explain a range of phenomena. Research on help-giving, for example, reveals that people readily proffer help to a person who appears to be a victim of circumstances but not to an individual who is responsible for his or her own plight (Weiner, 1980). This bias might accrue from the typecasting of a victim as a moral patient—and the complementary typecasting of a responsible individual as an agent unworthy of assistance. In a similar vein, research on the sick role has shown that those who are sick or incapacitated are held less responsible for their actions (Arluke, Kennedy, & Kessler, 1979), perhaps because the sick person’s identity as a moral patient blocks the perception of his or her moral agency. — Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner, Moral Typecasting, 29

Categorization

  • SEED: The pattern here — a single category shift (to ‘victim’/‘sick’) biasing both help and responsibility judgments — is exactly the movable experimental lever the reader wants to translate to religious groups recategorized as ‘ideological.’
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner, Moral Typecasting: Divergent…, 29
  • XREF: connects to: Recategorizing a target by morally relevant features alters perceived agency. — Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner, Moral Typecasting: Divergent…, 51; Recategorizing a target’s status shifts perceived agency and victimhood in complementary directions — Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner, Moral Typecasting: Divergent…, 37; Perceived moral agency uniquely suppresses perceived victimhood, separable from general agency — Kurt Gray and Daniel M. Wegner, Moral Typecasting: Divergent…, 105 (+3 more)

Broader Connections