Pre-state trading communities sustained honesty through reputation systems backed by private judges.

Evidence

A good reputation can be an effective bond for honest behavior in a community of traders if members of the community know how others have behaved in the past - even if any particular pair of traders meets only infrequently. In a large community, it would be impossibly costly for traders to be perfectly informed about each other’s behavior, but there exist institutions that can restore the effectiveness of a reputation system using much less extensive information. The system of judges used to enforce commercial law before the rise of the state was such an institution, and it successfully encouraged merchants (1) to behave honestly, (2) to impose sanctions on violators, (3) to become adequately informed about how others had behaved, (4) to provide evidence against violators of the code, and (5) to pay any judgments assessed against them, even though each of these behaviors might be personally costly. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 1

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to the reader’s Gambetta/Milgrom model of private protection and private judges as substitutes for state legitimacy. — connects to: Private legal systems can rival state law when reputation functions as enforcement. — Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 16; Trust matters everywhere, but cheap reputation bonds enable fully private law — Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 167; A private tribunal can enforce judgments through instantaneous reputational publicity. — Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 238 (+13 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Supports the frame of private enforcement stepping in when formal legal channels fail, paralleling the Godfather analysis.

Broader Connections