Plea bargaining shifts sentencing control from legislatures to courtroom actors’ discretion

Evidence

As critics claim, plea bargaining does transfer control over sentencing from state legislatures and judges operating within statutory guidelines to judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys collectively exercising broad discretion. Yet the critics’ charge that this insulates sentencing from popular control is only partly valid. — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1809

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Frames plea bargaining as a transfer of institutional power rather than a mere procedural convenience.
  • XREF: Connects to judicial policymaking and popular control themes of the course. — connects to: Severity of charges drives defendants toward trial or negotiated pleas — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1664; Repeat players in one courtroom develop shared familiarity that shapes plea bargaining — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1749; Repeated interaction among courtroom workgroup members promotes cooperative plea bargaining — G. Alan Tarr, Judicial Process and Judicial…, 1784 (+12 more)

Broader Connections