Microsociology’s localism fails once interaction is disembedded from physical place.

Evidence

The assumptions that have characterized much microsociological thinking in the past—those of the relative autonomy of micro-orders and their conïŹnement to the physical setting—are theoretically no longer adequate in a world in which interaction can also be disembedded from local settings, in which space may be separated from place (Giddens 1990, p. 18) and in which situations may link participants who are physically located in different continents and time zones. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 21

Categorization

  • XREF: Giddens’ space/place disembedding connects to reader’s finance material on remote screen trading — traders co-present in a situation but continents apart. Also evokes the online-community literature. — connects to: Modern place is a local expression of distant, disembedded relations — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 260; Microsociology of everyday life must link micro events to macro power structures — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 1469; Reintroducing context does not necessarily align a network with physical place. — Jenny Odell, How to Do Nothing: Resisting the
, 582 (+2 more)
  • QUESTION: Wonder whether later chapters actually operationalize ‘witnessing’ in a global, disembedded setting or whether it stays a programmatic gesture.

Broader Connections