Mafia enforcement makes distrust rational and blights mutual-benefit competition

Evidence

As Gambetta (1988, 172–73) notes, the Mafia might help someone sell fraudulently. This implicitly would make clear that without Mafia protection distrust of one’s fellows is rational and would therefore undercut competition that would benefit almost everyone. — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 972

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • QUESTION: A strong test for Hardin’s encoded-heuristics model: can rational distrust persist as an equilibrium even when the original occasion for it has vanished?

Broader Connections

  • Pervasive distrust is stable because solo cooperation invites exploitation #corroborates (0.88) — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 475
  • State unreliability cascades into mutual distrust that blocks cooperation #expands (0.85) — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 492
  • Self-fulfilling distrust becomes individually rational and resistant to disproof #corroborates (0.82) — Diego Gambetta, Trust - Making and Breaking Cooperative…, 2863
  • Democracy’s need for consensus forces complicity with the mafia #expands (0.75) — Diego Gambetta, Trust - Making and Breaking Cooperative…, 2196
  • The mafia persists in a turbulent equilibrium without monopoly or dissolution #expands (0.72) — Diego Gambetta, Trust - Making and Breaking Cooperative…, 2178