Journalists choose terror-related terms partly for stylistic variety rather than analytical precision

Evidence

In the end we’ve used a number of terms and you have to appreciate this is always tricky because in journalism you have to find more than one way of saying everything, otherwise it becomes boring. So we talk a lot about al-Qa¯‘ida-inspired terrorism; the word ‘Islamist’ has become reasonably accepted as a way of describing a certain type of person who takes a view … but all these terms are tricky because there are people who might well describe themselves as an ‘Islamist’ but who would never dream of wanting to blow people up. — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 111

Categorization

  • QUESTION: This empirical finding that term choice is driven by boredom-avoidance complicates the assumption that media language reflects ideological framing — worth chasing the source study.
  • SEED: An article angle: how the craft constraints of journalism (variety, brevity) silently shape public definitions of Islamophobia and terrorism discourse.
  • XREF: connects to: Media distinction between Islam and terrorism was blurred by inflationary language — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 571; Media coverage of Muslim violence superficially supports an Islam-violence link — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 282; Islamophobic framing operates dialogically as call-and-response pressing writers to comply or contest (+4 more)

Broader Connections