Media distinction between Islam and terrorism was blurred by inflationary language

Evidence

Despite the EUMC 7/7 report noting that, ‘the media appears to have avoided linking directly the Muslim faith or Muslim communities in general with terrorism or radical groups. In many cases, mainstream media made particular efforts to differentiate between the pseudo-religious justification of terrorism and the Muslim faith …’, it did go on to add that ’… this distinction has sometimes been blurred by inflationary language and headlines such as “Islamic terrorism”, and in many cases the use of terms “Islam”, “Muslim”, [and] “fundamentalism” seems to confuse rather than educate the reader’. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 571

Categorization

  • SHARE: The specific nominal vs. actual media practice distinction from the EUMC report is a narrow, citable detail ideal for someone tracking media framing literature.
  • XREF: connects to: News organizations differ in how they frame Muslim religion as a public issue — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 90; Journalists choose terror-related terms partly for stylistic variety rather than analytical precision — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 111; British press blame for radicalization shifted toward extremist Islam itself — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 640 (+14 more)

Broader Connections