Hobbes’s prejudice against Native Americans was civilizational rather than racial.

Evidence

Hobbes eschews both geographical and biological determinism, it would seem then that the prejudice is civilizational, not racial. For Hobbes, America seems to be excluded a priori from the process of civilization, and with it, from modern civility altogether, its populations outside of history, imprisoned in ‘nature.’ This exclusion, however, is not CDnal and can be overcome by, of course, the process of ‘civilization’ itself. — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 71

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s interest in civility-framing and how a political community imagines its own cohesion — here Hobbes excludes a group from civility entirely, framing them as outside history, which bears on the threat-based vs. project-based solidarity question. — connects to: Calling Hobbes a racist need not be anachronistic. — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 17; Hobbes locates his hypothesized state of nature in the living present of Americas’ peoples — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 24; Hobbes’s exclusionary frame is cultural-historical civility rather than biological race — , Stephanie B. Martens - Civilization and
, 25 (+11 more)
  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: if exclusion is civilizational and reversible through ‘civilization,’ does this framing soften or merely modernize the justification for colonial domination of Native American polities?

Broader Connections