French counterinsurgency repeatedly traded military advantage for political costs

Evidence

Regroupment undeniably made life much more difficult for the A.L.N., but—as so often in the Algerian war—French policy found itself caught in the insoluble paradox of what was good militarily being bad politically, and vice versa. It was a pitfall into which, to some extent, the Americans were to stumble in South Vietnam. By the Battle of Algiers, Germaine Tillion concluded gloomily, “The implantation of the F.L.N. in the Algerian masses was too deep for any détente whatever to occur without the global agreement which it alone could give.” — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 693

Categorization

  • XREF: The military/political paradox directly parallels the reader’s overarching reading purpose of tracing the ‘Savage War of Peace’ permutations across Algeria and colonial Africa. — connects to: A militarily victorious counterinsurgency can still lose due to non-battlefield factors; The Philippeville massacre proved a strategic net gain for the F.L.N.; Military success on the battlefield coexisted with a sense that political betrayal was imminent. (+13 more)

Broader Connections