Guerrilla warfare made French suppression of the insurgency fail

Evidence

The F.L.N., growing more experienced, wilier and more cautious about accepting combat with superior French forces, became like mountain sheep — always one ledge, one ridge higher up in the wintry mountains than their pursuers. The war in the Aurès began to bog down, to the deep dissatisfaction of Mendès-France and, even more, of the impatient pied noir leaders in Algiers. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 329 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

From the French army’s point of view, their tragedy was that at various points they could see with agonising clarity (and not without reason) that they were winning the war militarily. But (not unlike the American commanders in Vietnam) it was not given them to perceive that, at the same time, their chances of winning the war politically and on the wider world stage were growing ever slimmer. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1653 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Regroupment undeniably made life much more difficult for the A.L.N., but—as so often in the Algerian war—French policy found itself caught in the insoluble paradox of what was good militarily being bad politically, and vice versa. It was a pitfall into which, to some extent, the Americans were to stumble in South Vietnam. By the Battle of Algiers, Germaine Tillion concluded gloomily, “The implantation of the F.L.N. in the Algerian masses was too deep for any détente whatever to occur without the global agreement which it alone could give.” — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 693 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Wilaya 4 pioneered forms of revolutionary warfare that worried the French command; A militarily victorious counterinsurgency can still lose due to non-battlefield factors; The FLN targeted native police to cripple French counterinsurgency. (+24 more)

Broader Connections