Dog-whistle theory may be outdated because overt racial prejudice is now socially acceptable.

Evidence

Recently, Valentino et al. (2018) found across four nationally representative survey experiments that implicit appeals are no more effective than explicit appeals in increasing the power of racial animus on whites’ policy preferences. They argued that this is not due to a problem in racial priming theory as it was initially formulated but rather is due to a changing political environment in which overt displays of racial prejudice have become more socially acceptable. — Rachel Wetts and Robb Willer, Who Is Called by the Dog Whistle?…, 26

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Directly relevant to the reading purpose about whether threat-hardened convictions backfire when corrected—if overt racism no longer needs concealment, the entire manufactured-enemy mechanism differs.
  • ADDENDUM: Connects to the question of whether professed egalitarian conviction predicts actual bias; here the claim is that egalitarian norms themselves have decayed.
  • XREF: connects to: Dog whistles activate latent racial prejudice while evading egalitarian norms — Rachel Wetts and Robb Willer, Who Is Called by the Dog Whistle?…, 5; Old-fashioned racism declined but prejudice mutated into subtler forms; Overt racism no longer sustains racial inequality; daily habits do. — Eddie S. Glaude Jr., Democracy in Black: How Race Still…, 139 (+8 more)

Broader Connections