Claiming Islam is a monolith requires denying its historical diversity

Evidence

It is often taken for granted that Islam is homogeneous. This is in large part because Orientalists propagated the myth that Islam is a monolith that can be fully understood through its classical texts. It is only when one works from such an assumption that one can make claims about a static entity, the “Muslim civilization,” with a core set of unchanging values, or about the “Muslim mind” (viewed in the singular, as though all Muslims share a hive mind). By denying the diversity of Islamic history and practices, it becomes possible to state that “Islam” has certain inherent, unchanging characteristics that render it anti-democratic, violent, sexist, and so on. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 273

Categorization

  • XREF: Anchors the homogenizing common-sense point already logged across ch8 and the ‘Homo islamicus’ thread; fine as framing but partly restated. — connects to: Islam as a monolith is a nominal fiction masking internal diversity; The myth that Islam is a monolith enables claims about inherent Muslim traits; Treating Islam as a monolith underlies claims about its inherent unchanging traits. (+10 more)
  • yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Islam as a monolith is a nominal fiction masking internal diversity; The myth that Islam is a monolith enables claims about inherent Muslim traits; Treating Islam as a monolith underlies claims about its inherent unchanging traits. (+10 more)

Broader Connections