The term Islam misrepresents most diverse Muslim life

Evidence

Only the tiniest fraction of this diverse Muslim energy is available to the Westerner now being asked by the media and by government spokesmen to consider “Islam.” The most serious misrepresentations occur when Islamic “resurgence” is solicited. In the minds and hearts of its adherents, surely Islam has always been resurgent, alive, rich in thought, feeling, and human production. And always in the thoughts of the faithful the “Islamic vision” (in W. Montgomery Watt’s useful phrase64) has involved them in creative dilemmas. What is justice? What is evil? When are orthodoxy and tradition to be relied on? When is ijtihad (individual interpretation) in order? The questions multiply, and the work gets done — yet we in the West see or hear little of it. So much of Islamic life is neither bound by texts nor confined to personalities or neat structures as to make the overused word “Islam” an unreliable index of what we try to apprehend. — Edward W. Said, Covering Islam, 202

Categorization

  • XREF: Resonates with Levi-Strauss and critique of single-word civilizational labels, and with Said’s own Orientalism thesis about totalizing categories. — connects to: Claiming Islam is a monolith requires denying its historical diversity; The global Muslim population of 1.8 billion is internally diverse and geographically dispersed; Religion is one factor among many, not the defining one, in Muslim-majority societies