Orientalist histories reduce Islam to dynastic chronology while bypassing belief

Evidence

The Orientalists—from Renan to Goldziher to Macdonald to von Grunebaum, Gibb, and Bernard Lewis—saw Islam, for example, as a “cultural synthesis” (the phrase is P. M. Holt’s) that could be studied apart from the economics, sociology, and politics of the Islamic peoples. For Orientalism, Islam had a meaning which, if one were to look for its most succinct formulation, could be found in Renan’s first treatise: in order best to be understood Islam had to be reduced to “tent and tribe.” The impact of colonialism, of worldly circumstances, of historical development: all these were to Orientalists as flies to wanton boys, killed—or disregarded—for their sport, never taken seriously enough to complicate the essential Islam. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 294 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Political frustration drives orientalists to produce reductive intellectual claims about Islam; Orientalist assumptions restrict non-Western history to relations with the West; Orientalism presents Arabs as static types rather than historical agents (+3 more)

Broader Connections