Categorizing at a broader level diffuses responsibility and lowers collective guilt

Evidence

To the extent that responsibility for harmful outcomes is diffused, little collective guilt may be experienced. Marques, Paez, and Sera (1997) describe how referencing the “dark times” when many European nations acted on colonial agendas allowed their Portuguese participants to not feel guilty when they were confronted with the ways their national group had harmed other groups. Just as diffusion across individuals can reduce personal responsibility for the harm experienced by others (Latan´e & Darley, 1968), diffusion of responsibility across groups permits group members to perceive their group as less uniquely responsible for the harm doing. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt, 2117

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallels the bystander-effect diffusion literature and the earlier chapter-15 finding on inclusive categorization lowering guilt. — connects to: Perceiving victims and perpetrators as one human group lowers guilt assignment. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 1937; Shifting categorization level changes whether the same person counts as ingroup or outgroup. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 1950; Guilt requires self-categorizing as a group member — Torsten Masson and Markus Barth, The identification-guilt paradox…, 20 (+8 more)

Broader Connections