A randomized minimax strategy deliberately destroys all communication between players

Evidence

With a minimax solution, a zero-sum game is reduced to a completely unilateral affair. One not only does not need to communicate with his opponent, he does not even need to know who the opponent is or whether there is one. A randomized strategy is dramatically anti-communicative; it is a deliberate means of destroying any possibility of communication, especially communication of intentions, inadvertent or otherwise. It is a means of expunging from the game all details except the mathematical structure of the payoff, and from the players all communicative relations. β€” Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 250

Categorization

  • XREF: Contrast to the Mafia’s mode: the Corleones must communicate commitments and intentions, the opposite of the self-effacing randomized strategy. β€” connects to: Threats and promises are meaningless in zero-sum games β€” Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 204; Coordination play seeks a meeting of minds while minimax play avoids any β€” Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 229; Destroying communication can be a winning move in coordination games. β€” Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 339 (+3 more)

Broader Connections