Worker cooperative governance needs dispersed countervailing power against both executives and members.

Evidence

In a Mondragon case, managers delayed advancing cost-cutting proposals to the General Assembly for fear of rejection, a hesitation reinforced after the dismissal of a CEO (Basterretxea et al., 2022). This underscores the need for countervailing power through dispersed authority across committees, not only to limit executive overreach towards a symbiotic strategic direction, but also excessive member influence that may opt for interstitial strategies (Paranque & Willmott, 2014; Shanahan, 2024). — Adrian Josef Amon, Organizing the study of degeneration…, 70

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces ‘interstitial strategies’ as a term of art worth defining.”
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Adrian Josef Amon, Organizing the study of degeneration…, 70
  • XREF: connects to: In organizations power generates its own countervailing power.; Effective democracy generates antagonism that can destroy cooperatives if not accommodated. — Adrian Josef Amon, Organizing the study of degeneration…, 71; Worker councils structurally rotated leadership to keep power with workers. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 538 (+1 more)

Broader Connections