Visual and contextual cues bias human judgments of sound quality

Evidence

For example, the sound of a red car is perceived to be louder than a blue or green one, with a difference corresponding to 1–3 dB of SPL (Menzel et al., 2008). The audio track also influences eye movements and the direction of gaze, and sound has been shown to strengthen the salience of corresponding visual events (Coutrot et al., 2012). — Ville Pulkki, Matti Karjalainen, Communication Acoustics- An…, 1822 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Figure 10.1 shows that in the blind tests, there were two pairs of statistically indistinguishable loudspeakers: the two European “voicings” of the same hardware were rated significantly higher than the other two products, which were also in a statistical tie. In the sighted version of the test, loyal employees gave the big attractive Harman products even higher scores, still tied. However, the little inexpensive sub/sat system dropped significantly in the ratings; apparently its unappealing black plastic exterior overcame employee loyalty. Obviously, something small and inexpensive cannot compete with something large and stylishly crafted of highly polished wood. The large, attractive competitor improved its rating but not enough to win out over the local product. It all seemed very predictable from the biasing influences. … In general, seeing the loudspeakers changed what listeners thought they heard. — Toole, Floyd E, Sound reproduction- the acoustics and…, 1058 (#exemplifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Subjects bias adjustment experiments by setting sounds louder for good audibility; Vision and sound expectations must concord for convincing audio-scene perception; Context-dependent compensation shapes sound perception much as with color vision (+18 more)

Broader Connections