Universalization is an irreducible moment in any discourse.

Evidence

So, I am fundamentally concerned with that heterogeneity hut I chose a universal discourse in that moment because I felt that rather than define myself as repudiating universality, because universalisation, finalisation, is an irreducible moment in any discourse - rather than define myself as specific rather than universal - I should see what in the universalizing dis- course could be useful and then go on to see where that discourse meets its limits and its challenge within that field. — Elizabeth Grosz, Criticism, Feminism and the Institution, 120

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The premise that universalization is an irreducible structural moment in all discourse reframes the whole strategic-essentialism debate: the question is never whether to escape universality but which universal to inhabit — teasing this out would reward long reflection.
  • XREF: Echoes Foucault’s premise that counter-histories must re-occupy power’s terrain rather than step outside it. — connects to: The essentializing moment that criticism attacks is itself irreducible. — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 1762; Universal generalization is a totalitarian imposition on the world — Édouard Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 162; Universality arises only from a specific grounded voice, not abstraction (+3 more)

Broader Connections