Essentializing is unavoidable even in anti-essentialist critique, so it should be deployed consciously.

Evidence

Spivak :* You see, you are committed to these concepts, whether you acknowledge it or not. I think it’s absolutely on target not to be rhetorically committed to it and I think it’s absolutely on target to take a stand against the discourses of essentialism, universalism as it comes in terms of the universal - of classical German philosophy or the universal as the white upper class rnal~ … etc. But strategically we canr~ot. Even as we talk about feminist practice, or privileging practice over theory, we are universalising - not only generalising but universalising. — Elizabeth Grosz, Criticism, Feminism and the Institution, 125

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Captures the original sense of strategic essentialism: not a choice to adopt essentialism as identity, but an acceptance that essentializing is irreducible and hence best used deliberately rather than repudiated.
  • XREF: Shows Spivak grounding the term in the Levinasian ‘onto-phenomenological question’ and the critique of ‘classical German philosophy’—relevant to the reader’s tracing from Foucault’s counter-history. — connects to: One cannot not be an essentialist to some degree, even in critique. — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 55; A critique of essentialism must remain internal to essentialism. — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 55; Essentialist-sounding definitions can be adopted provisionally without belief in essence — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 453 (+1 more)

Broader Connections