The threat of publicity substitutes for formal judicial enforcement.

Evidence

Under New York law, binding arbitration awards can be confirmed in civil court. If this is done, the judgment has the same force and effect as an initial court award. In practice, however, it is rarely necessary for a party to a DDC arbitration to seek confirmation of a judgment. While arbitration awards are officially kept secret, a confirmation proceeding in court would quickly become public knowledge. Thus, the dealer against whom the judgment was entered would suffer severe damage to his reputation. β€” Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 107

Categorization

  • XREF: Privacy is intra-community; publicity is the club’s cudgel β€” parallels how reputation operates in the dense Sicilian network where public knowledge of dishonor destroys standing. β€” connects to: Agenda confinement and publicity neutralize extortionate threats in negotiation β€” Thomas C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, 85; A private tribunal can enforce judgments through instantaneous reputational publicity. β€” Lisa Bernestein, Opting out of the Legal System, 238; Public humiliation substitutes for weak legal enforcement of debts (+5 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: A genuinely counterintuitive inversion: confidentiality is the deterrent. The club keeps awards secret so that the only path to publication is the public court, making the very act of seeking formal enforcement the punishment.

Broader Connections