The sample design could separate race-based from religion-based discrimination experiences

Evidence

Without this evidence EEOC proved only that the employee was disadvantaged because he had PFB, not that he was disadvantaged because he was black. — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 235 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Sociological approaches insist race and ethnicity have autonomous, non-reducible effects; Establishing disparate impact requires comparing affected groups rather than proving individual disadvantage — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 235; Matched-pair field experiments provide the strongest evidence of hiring discrimination — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 278

Related

• Establishing disparate impact requires comparing affected groups rather than proving individual disadvantage (similarity 0.90)
• Matched-pair field experiments provide the strongest evidence of hiring discrimination (similarity 0.82)

Broader Connections

• Establishing disparate impact requires comparing affected groups rather than proving individual disadvantage #expands (0.75) — Ruggero J. Aldisert, Agatha D. Aldisert, Logic for Lawyers- A Guide to Clear…, 235
• Sociological approaches insist race and ethnicity have autonomous, non-reducible effects #corroborates (0.60)