The radicalization literature overwhelmingly measures attitudes and intentions rather than actual violent behavior.

Evidence

Regarding the outcome variable, 36 of the reviewed studies tested violent extremist attitudes and beliefs, 44 tested violent extremist intentions, and 5 tested violent extremist behaviors, with 22 studies having examined more than one outcome variable. — Lea Echelmeyer, Anne-Marie Slotboom, and Frank Weerman, The Putative Effect of Identity on…, 50

Categorization

  • XREF: A key inferential gap when assessing whether negative identity predicts real extremist action rather than survey self-reports. — connects to: RWA and SDO scales actually measure ideological attitudes rather than personality traits. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 2463; Violent extremism is operationalized as attitudes, intentions, and past violence. — Lea Echelmeyer, Anne-Marie Slotboom, and Frank Weerman, The Putative Effect of Identity on…, 34; Anti-Semitism research shifted to measuring personality structure rather than external factors. (+2 more)
  • QUESTION: Does the negative-identity mechanism survive when outcomes are actual behaviors rather than self-reported attitudes or intentions?

Broader Connections