The legal self-identification requirement for ethnic groups constitutes self-racialization

Evidence

The case law suggests that for discrimination law, at least when it comes to groups commonly understood in ethnic or religious terms to whom other proxies of race, such as colour or national origin do not readily apply, race is a matter of how both others (e.g. society, the state, discriminators, villifiers) see a group and how a group sees itself. Given that the law speaks of ethnicity, this requirement could also be called ethnicization (Bloul 2008) but in light of ‘ethnic’ constituting a proxy or allied term for race in law, here I suggest that it might be better to understand the required process as self-racialization. — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination
, 57

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces the book’s core coinage ‘self-racialization’ as reframing of the legal self-identification requirement when ‘ethnic’ proxies for race.
  • XREF: connects to: The self-identification requirement entered law via ‘ethnic’, not via race itself — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination
, 36; Racial discrimination can precede and constitute a group’s own racialized self-understanding — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination
, 66; Both self-identification and actuality requirements shift legal focus from discriminators’ attitudes to victims’ identity — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination
, 75 (+10 more)

Broader Connections