The Egyptian state claimed sole authority over a religious duty to fend off militants

Evidence

The religious class [in Islam] did not pose the sort of challenge to temporal authority that the religious hierarchy presided over by the pope did to emperors and kings in medieval and early modern Europe. The dispersal of religious authority in Islam therefore normally prevented a direct clash between temporal and religious power, as happened in medieval Christendom… . It also helped preclude the establishment of a single orthodoxy that, in alliance with the state, could suppress all dissenting tendencies and oppress their followers, as happened in Christian Europe during the medieval and early modern periods. Wars of religion and persecution of “heretical” sects were therefore infrequent in Islamdom in contrast to Christendom. At the same time, it promoted the creation of distinct religious and political spheres that by and large respected each other’s autonomy. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 296 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Egyptian state secularism regulates religious practice into state-endorsed forms — Saba Mahmood, Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival…, 533; Dispersed religious authority in Islam prevented church-state clashes — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 296; A secular state co-opted and thereby financed its own religious opposition (+7 more)

Broader Connections

• Dispersed religious authority in Islam prevented church-state clashes #complicates (0.72) — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 296