Sacralizing religion extends state power across identity, law, and violence

Evidence

What stands at the center of our inquiry is the impact of the intertwining, particularly when religious claims and nationalism are fused to the extent that religious claims bestow sacredness on the state’s working of power. Examples include establishing the state’s identity; determining regime type, including governmentality and the questions of democracy and equality; codifying laws accordingly; defining the politics of state territoriality; endorsing particular perceptions of the “self” and the “other”; engaging in strategic and policy planning; and sanctioning state violence in the service of all of the above. — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized, 67

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly serves the reader’s core question: the volume treats religious sacralization of state power as the mechanism converting ideology into exclusion, law, and sanctioned violence. Connects to sacred-values framework mentioned in the reader’s stated purpose. — connects to: Religion functions as the enabling power behind a preferential legal system — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized:…, 1014; Politics fused with sacred religious claims follow distinctive conflict dynamics — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized:…, 66; Modern theology’s casuistry legitimizes state violence while preserving Christian status — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 835 (+11 more)

Broader Connections