The religion-secular boundary is a construct serving Western state power

Evidence

[T]he attempt to say that there is a transhistorical and transcultural concept of religion that is separable from secular phenomena is itself part of a particular configuration of power, that of the modern, liberal nation-state as it developed in the West. … To construe Christianity as a religion, therefore, helps to separate loyalty to God from one’s public loyalty to the nation-state. (Cavanaugh 2009, 59) Cavanaugh directs our attention to the ways in which the construction of the state as secular works to legitimize state violence. — Nadim N. Rouhana and Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian, When Politics Are Sacralized, 685

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to reader’s research into sacralized politics — the manufactured religion/secular binary parallels the manufactured external-enemy framing. — connects to: Secular government functions as a continuation of religious authority by other means — Norenzayan, Ara, Big gods - how religion transformed…, 564; A secular state co-opted and thereby financed its own religious opposition; Church-state separation is historically unique to the West and drove its freedom. — Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the…, 188 (+5 more)
  • DEFINE: Cavanaugh’s core claim that ‘religion’ as a separable category is itself a political construction of the liberal nation-state.

Broader Connections