The digital panopticon fails to register as surveillance because its subjects feel free

Evidence

Bentham’s Big Brother was invisible, but he was everywhere in prisoners’ minds. Inmates interiorized him. In contrast, the inhabitants of today’s digital panopticon never really feel that they are being watched or threatened. Consequently, ‘surveillance state’ is an imprecise name for describing the digital panopticon. Here, everyone feels free. However, precisely this feeling of freedom – which is nowhere to be found in Orwell’s state – is now the problem. — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics, 91

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Shows why ‘surveillance state’ misframes the digital panopticon: interiorized watching vs. unregistered self-exposure.
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Neoliberal power works so invisibly that the subject believes it is free — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New…, 44; Visible surveillance makes subjects police themselves without any force — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 315; Digital surveillance works because people voluntarily expose themselves — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New…, 32 (+5 more)

Broader Connections