Digital self-tracking makes each person a self-surveilling guard and inmate in one.

Evidence

The auto-exploiting subject carries around its own labour camp; here, it is perpetrator and victim at one and the same time. As a self-illuminating, self-surveilling subject, it bears its own, internal panopticon within; here, there is no difference between guard and inmate. The digitalized, networked subject is a panopticon of itself. This ensures that each and every person has now taken on the task of conducting perpetual auto-surveillance. — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics, 139

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The internalized panopticon where surveiller and surveilled collapse into one subject is a genuinely paradigm-shifting reframing of Foucault for the digital age.
  • XREF: Connects to the We (Zamyatin) total system and to the internal surveillance themes in the reader’s own library; also the natural successor to Discipline and Punish’s external panopticon. — connects to: Digital surveillance works because people voluntarily expose themselves — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New…, 32; One observation action suffices to make prisoners police their own behavior permanently — Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, 59; Surveillance controls populations chiefly through internalized self-policing — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 44 (+3 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Relevant to ‘On Sacrifice’ only loosely, but directly extends the infrastructure metaphor of ‘Grafting & Growth’ into the digital-social realm as an invisible infrastructure of control.

Broader Connections