The anti-busing movement mobilized white suburban middle-class moderates, not just ideologues.

Evidence

While traditional leaders in Charlotte wanted resistance to come in the court of law, the organized uprising of the Silent Majority extended the battle into the court of public opinion and the arena of electoral politics. During the late winter and early spring of 1970, the CPA established itself as a powerful grassroots force in Charlotte, an accidental social movement of middle-class populism that embraced mass-action techniques with remarkable speed and efficiency. The foot soldiers of this energized Silent Majority included not only ideological conservatives but also many political moderates and suburban swing voters, and white-collar married couples dominated the local leadership—physicians, dentists, insurance agents, attorneys, small business owners, middle managers, and their spouses. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 68

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly supports the reader’s primary reading purpose on segregationist ideology retreating and rebranding under political pressure; the CPA’s composition shows how such movements depended on a broad moderate base, not just committed racists. — connects to: A middle-class antibusing movement forced segregationist ideology into a ‘color-blind’ populist frame. — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 51; Ordinary segregationists, not politicians, sustained flexible white resistance — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 29; Antibusing activists were civic suburban parents, not ideologues — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 33 (+6 more)

Broader Connections