Subtle and even subliminal environmental primes shift people’s self-perceived traits.

Evidence

Research examining influences on individuals’ self-views assumes that the traits, goals, and evaluations one associates with oneself can shift in response to subtle influences in the environment (e.g., Dijksterhuis, Chartrand, & Aarts, 2007; Mussweiler, 2007; Wheeler, DeMarree, & Petty, 2007). Research on social comparison has demonstrated that even subliminal social comparison standards related to intelligence can produce assimilative (Stapel & Blanton, 2004) and contrastive (Mussweiler, Ruter, & Epstude, 2004) shifts in individuals’ self-perceived intelligence. Similarly, the mere activation of self-irrelevant social categories, such as the African American stereotype among European American participants, can produce shifts in individuals’ self-conceptions (e.g., increased self-perceived aggressiveness; see DeMarree & Loersch, 2009; DeMarree, Wheeler, & Petty, 2005; see also Dijksterhuis et al., 1998; Schubert & Häfner, 2003). — Brandon Randolph-Seng, Darcy A. Reich, and Kenneth G. DeMarree, On the Nonconscious Antecedents of…, 11

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s question: subliminal social-comparison standards shifting self-perceived intelligence suggests identification processes that need not involve conscious threat perception, parallels the ‘conscious threat’ question under test. — connects to: Salient self-categories make people perceive themselves as interchangeable group exemplars. — Nurit Shnabel and Johannes Ullrich, Identity Needs in Intergroup Relations:…, 53; Perceived personal permanence is borrowed from stable surroundings, not from the for-itself — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 1283; Empathic people are more susceptible to subliminal cues and influence — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 945 (+3 more)

Broader Connections