Structural hierarchy suppresses the development of commoner subjectivity.

Evidence

In CLT communities, key decisions are normally taken by a board of residents and local (often educated, professional, older) stakeholders, while some residents (younger, working class) are not involved at all, compromising their chances of developing a commoners’ subjectivity. — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning, 90

Categorization

• XREF: Connects to the governance/bylaw thread in the ‘Complaints About Immodesty’ essay — different arena, same dynamic where an elite board captures the moral/participatory high ground while the marginal are excluded. — connects to: Technocratic consciousness suppresses the communicative interest at the core of socialization — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2691; Legitimized status hierarchies suppress ethnocentrism at the cost of subordinate self-esteem; The discursive perspective reintroduces non-unitary subjectivity that structuralism had abolished (+3 more)
• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 90

Broader Connections

• Technocratic consciousness suppresses the communicative interest at the core of socialization #corroborates (0.82) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 2691
• The discursive perspective reintroduces non-unitary subjectivity that structuralism had abolished #corroborates (0.80)
• Legitimized status hierarchies suppress ethnocentrism at the cost of subordinate self-esteem #corroborates (0.75)