The discursive perspective reintroduces non-unitary subjectivity that structuralism had abolished

Evidence

The difference is that, whereas culturalism would correct the hyper-structuralism of earlier models by restoring the unified subject (collective or individual) of consciousness at the center of “the Structure,” discourse theory, by way of the Freudian concepts of the unconscious and the Lacanian concepts of how subjects are constituted in language (through the entry into the Symbolic and the Law of Culture), restores the decentered subject, the contradictory subject, as a set of positions in language and knowledge, from which culture can appear to be enunciated. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 204 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Pynchon’s encyclopedic novel of WWII rocketry doubles as a treatise on communication: paranoid signals, encrypted messages, conditioning experiments, and the V-2 as both weapon and meaning-making apparatus. The novel renders Pavlovian behaviorism, ballistic mathematics, and corporate cartels as overlapping communication systems. Its method is hallucinatory polyphony. For COMM scholars, Gravity’s Rainbow models how warfare, science, and media converge in what Friedrich Kittler would later theorize as discourse networks. Its relevance to contemporary AI debates lies in its early dramatization of how technical systems shape subjectivity, anticipating Zuboff’s instrumentarian power and the algorithmic governance critiqued by Eubanks and Noble. — , The Braided Reading EPUB, 1224 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: The discursive turn requires reintroducing the subject as non-unitary and internally contradictory; Structuralism inverts culturalism’s claim by making experience an effect of categories; Discourse theory restores a decentered subject while culturalism restores a unified consciousness — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 204 (+12 more)

Broader Connections