Social practices drive ongoing formation of commoning subjects.

Evidence

The embodied and relational nature of subjectivities means that social practices are a vital element in commoners’ subject formation process, that drives the circle of commoning and shape commoning communities. Through these social practices, members are formed as commoning subjects in the way that works best for their community; and so, the circle keeps on turning, evolving in response to external and internal changes. — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning, 94

Categorization

• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 94
• XREF: connects to: Commoning joins producing shared goods with cultivating collective skills and character. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 99; Commoning should be analysed through internal and external dynamics among subjectivities, visions and practices. — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 6; Becoming a commoner, visions, and social practices shape each other cyclically — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 38 (+5 more)

Related

• Commoning practices simultaneously produce group relations, member subjectivities, and material culture. (similarity 0.93)
• Becoming a commoner, visions, and social practices shape each other cyclically (similarity 0.93)
• Commoning simultaneously shapes and is shaped by its practitioners (similarity 0.91)
• Commoning should be analysed through internal and external dynamics among subjectivities, visions and practices. (similarity 0.90)
• Commoning communities vary with context and adapt over time. (similarity 0.87)
• Commoner subjectivities emerge historically through practice rather than being fixed identities. (similarity 0.87)
• Commoning transforms participants’ identities even as it embeds practices of power and difference (similarity 0.86)
• Commoning joins producing shared goods with cultivating collective skills and character. (similarity 0.85)
• Members’ class and racial identities shape how communities do commoning. (similarity 0.84)
• Commons governance proceeds through a fixed cycle of subjectivity, vision, and practice. (similarity 0.83)
• Commoning practices vary with each commons’ unique context, aims, membership and culture. (similarity 0.82)

Broader Connections

• Commoning transforms participants’ identities even as it embeds practices of power and difference #expands (0.85) — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 15