Social knowledge alters its subject, unlike natural-science observation

Evidence

Knowledge claimed by expert observers (in some part, and in many varying ways) rejoins its subject matter, thus (in principle, but also normally in practice) altering it. There is no parallel to this process in the natural sciences; it is not at all the same as where, in the field of microphysics, the intervention of an observer changes what is being studied. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 116

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharpens the definition of reflexivity by contrasting it with the observer effect in microphysics.
  • XREF: Distinguishing reflexivity from the natural-science observer effect — useful precision for the reader’s theoretical mapping. — connects to: Social science is more deeply implicated in modernity than natural science. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 104; Social science knowledge changes the social world it studies. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 103; Knowledge of social life does not produce greater control over fate — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 111 (+9 more)

Broader Connections