Social science knowledge changes the social world it studies.

Evidence

In the social sciences, to the unsettled character of all empirically based knowledge we have to add the “subversion” which comes from the reentry of social scientific discourse into the contexts it analyses. The reflection of which the social sciences are the formalised version (a specific genre of expert knowledge) is quite fundamental to the reflexivity of modernity as a whole. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 103

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s framing: sociological concepts like ‘faceless commitments’ reenter and reshape how institution-building is understood—a self-subverting loop Stevens never participates in. — connects to: Social science is more deeply implicated in modernity than natural science. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 104; New social knowledge alters the social world rather than merely describing it — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 363; Social knowledge alters its subject, unlike natural-science observation — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 116

Broader Connections