Knowledge of social life does not produce greater control over fate

Evidence

Hence the thesis that more knowledge about social life (even if that knowledge is as well buttressed empirically as it could possibly be) equals greater control over our fate is false. It is (arguably) true about the physical world, but not about the universe of social events. — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 111

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s thesis: Stevens’s institutional mastery gives him deep knowledge of his role but zero moral control — the Enlightenment assumption that knowledge yields control fails exactly where Stevens lives. — connects to: Sociology’s method-driven path has failed to deliver its Enlightenment promises; New social knowledge alters the social world rather than merely describing it — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 363; Knowledge of the social world makes that world inherently unstable — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 115 (+8 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: This overturns a founding Enlightenment assumption and is the chapter’s central claim; dense enough to sit with.

Broader Connections