Second-generation British Muslims replaced heritage labels with Islamic identity

Evidence

As Muslim communities grew in numbers and social and familial networks began to emerge, so a first generation of British-born Muslims duly emerged that grew up to identify themselves in quite different ways to their parents. For many, especially in the second and subsequent generations, the country of ancestral heritage was attributed much less emotional or cultural meaning. For many today, ancestral heritage constitutes little more than one facet of increasingly hybridised identity. But most relevant for the purposes of understanding the context within which Khan identifies, for these British-born Muslims the role and prominence of their religion – Islam – became increasingly important. Bhikhu Parekh voices this point with some clarity: ‘While the parents would have said that they were Muslims, their offspring say that they have a Muslim or Islamic identity …’ adding, ’… the difference is deep and striking’. Socially therefore a transformation was occurring which saw a shift away from a homogenous ‘Asian’ identity to a newer and more prominent ‘Muslim’ equivalent. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 51 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: British Muslims were ethnicized before being recognized as a faith group — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 185; Census ethnicity categories poorly capture British Muslim experience as proxies — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 112; Religious identity grew more salient than ethnicity among later-generation British Muslims — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 182 (+2 more)

Broader Connections